Our "The Roxy Soap" only can be classify as "Natural" and "Handmade" but not "Organic". The Roxy Soap write this blog to create awareness for the consumers to understand thier rights as a smart consumer. So that everyone do not mix up "Natural/ Handmade" and "Organic".
At The Roxy Soap, our main ingredient are:
Palm Oil
Coconut Oil
Olive Oil
Distilled Water
Sodium Hydroxide
To make soap, you need "Sodium Hydroxide", so in the market if anyone claimed that their soap are "Organic", do not believe them. Organic shouldn't be any chemical in it. For more detail, read:
The History of Soap
For the Palm Oil, Coconut Oil and Olive Oil source, we buy these oil from the super market, these are just food grade, Halal certificated oil, some even have GMP standard and HACCP standard. But the source of the farming standard are unknown. So The Roxy Soap did not care to clasify our soap are "Organic". Back to the question:
How to be "Organic"?
NO CHEMICAL BASE PESTICIDE/ FERTILIZER.
NO FACTORY BUILDING AROUND THE FARM IN RADIOUS 50KM.
NO CHEMICAL DUMPING AT THE FARM FOR THE PAST 20 YEARS.
NO CHEMICAL FACTORY BUILDING ON THE UPSTREAM OF THE WATER SOURCE 50KM.
Soil management
Plants need
nitrogen,
phosphorus, and
potassium, as well as
micronutrients and
symbiotic relationships with
fungi and other organisms to flourish, but getting enough nitrogen, and particularly synchronization so that plants get enough nitrogen at the right time (when plants need it most), is likely the greatest challenge for organic farmers.
Crop rotation and
green manure ("
cover crops") help to provide nitrogen through
legumes (more precisely, the
Fabaceae family) which fix nitrogen from the atmosphere through symbiosis with
rhizobial bacteria.
Intercropping, which is sometimes used for insect and disease control, can also increase soil nutrients, but the competition between the legume and the crop can be problematic and wider spacing between crop rows is required.
Crop residues can be
ploughed back into the soil, and different plants leave different amounts of nitrogen, potentially aiding synchronization.Organic farmers also use animal
manure, certain processed fertilizers such as seed meal and various
mineral powders such as
rock phosphate and
greensand, a naturally occurring form of
potash which provides potassium. Together these methods help to control
erosion. In some cases
pH may need to be amended. Natural pH amendments include
lime and
sulfur, but in the U.S. some compounds such as
iron sulfate,
aluminum sulfate,
magnesium sulfate, and soluble
boron products are allowed in organic farming.
Mixed farms with both
livestock and
crops can operate as
ley farms, whereby the land gathers fertility through growing nitrogen-fixing
forage grasses such as
white clover or
alfalfa and grows
cash crops or
cereals when fertility is established. Farms without livestock ("stockless") may find it more difficult to maintain fertility, and may rely more on external inputs such as imported
manure as well as grain legumes and green manures, although grain legumes may fix limited nitrogen because they are harvested.
Horticultural farms growing fruits and vegetables which operate in protected conditions are often even more reliant upon external inputs.
Biological research on soil and soil organisms has proven beneficial to organic farming. Varieties of bacteria and fungi break down chemicals, plant matter and animal waste into productive soil nutrients. In turn, they produce benefits of healthier yields and more productive soil for future crops. Fields with less or no manure display significantly lower yields, due to decreased soil microbe community, providing a healthier, more arable soil system.
Weed management
Organic weed management promotes weed suppression, rather than weed elimination, by enhancing crop competition and phytotoxic effects on weeds.Organic farmers integrate cultural, biological, mechanical, physical and chemical tactics to manage weeds without synthetic herbicides.
Organic standards require rotation of annual crops, meaning that a single crop cannot be grown in the same location without a different, intervening crop. Organic crop rotations frequently include weed-suppressive cover crops and crops with dissimilar life cycles to discourage weeds associated with a particular crop.Organic farmers strive to increase soil organic matter content, which can support microorganisms that destroy common weed seeds.
Other cultural practices used to enhance crop competitiveness and reduce weed pressure include selection of competitive crop varieties, high-density planting, tight row spacing, and late planting into warm soil to encourage rapid crop germination.
Mechanical and physical weed control practices used on organic farms can be broadly grouped as
- Tillage - Turning the soil between crops to incorporate crop residues and soil amendments; remove existing weed growth and prepare a seedbed for planting;
- Cultivation - Disturbing the soil after seeding;
- Mowing and cutting - Removing top growth of weeds;
- Flame weeding and thermal weeding - Using heat to kill weeds; and
- Mulching - Blocking weed emergence with organic materials, plastic films, or landscape fabric.
Some naturally-sourced chemicals are allowed for herbicidal use. These include certain formulations of
acetic acid (concentrated
vinegar),
corn gluten meal, and
essential oils. A few selective
bioherbicides based on fungal
pathogens have also been developed. At this time, however, organic herbicides and
bioherbicides play a minor role in the organic weed control toolbox.
[14]
Weeds can be controlled by grazing. For example,
geese have been used successfully to weed a range of organic crops including
cotton,
strawberries,
tobacco, and
corn,
[15] reviving the practice of keeping
cotton patch geese, common in the southern U.S. before the 1950s. Similarly, some
rice farmers introduce
ducks and
fish to wet
paddy fields to eat both weeds and
insects.
[16]
Controlling other organisms
Organisms aside from weeds that cause problems on organic farms include
arthropods (e.g. insects,
mites),
nematodes,
fungi and
bacteria. Organic farmers use a wide range of
Integrated Pest Management practices to prevent pests and diseases. These include, but are not limited to, crop rotation and nutrient management; sanitation to remove pest habitat; provision of habitat for beneficial organisms; selection of pest-resistant crops and animals; crop protection using physical barriers, such as
row covers; and crop diversification through
companion planting or establishment of
polycultures.
Organic farmers often depend on
biological pest control, the use of beneficial organisms to reduce pest populations. Examples of beneficial insects include
minute pirate bugs,
big-eyed bugs, and to a lesser extent
ladybugs (which tend to fly away), all of which eat a wide range of pests.
Lacewings are also effective, but tend to fly away.
Praying mantis tend to move more slowly and eat less heavily.
Parasitoid wasps tend to be effective for their selected prey, but like all small insects can be less effective outdoors because the wind controls their movement. Predatory mites are effective for controlling other mites.
[8]:66-90
When these practices are insufficient to prevent or control pests an organic farmer may apply a
pesticide. With some exceptions, naturally-occurring pesticides are allowed for use on organic farms, and synthetic substances are prohibited. Pesticides with different modes of action should be rotated to minimize development of
pesticide resistance.
Naturally-derived
insecticides allowed for use on organic farms use include
Bacillus thuringiensis (a bacterial toxin),
pyrethrum (a chrysanthemum extract),
spinosad (a bacterial metabolite),
neem (a tree extract) and
rotenone (a legume root extract). These are sometimes called
green pesticides because they are generally, but not necessarily, safer and more environmentally friendly than synthetic pesticides.
[8]:92[unreliable source?] Rotenone and
pyrethrum are particularly controversial because they work by attacking the nervous system, like most conventional insecticides. Fewer than 10% of organic farmers use these pesticides regularly; one survey found that only 5.3% of vegetable growers in California use
rotenone while 1.7% use
pyrethrum (
Lotter 2003:26).
Naturally-derived
fungicides allowed for use on organic farms include the bacteria
Bacillus subtilis and
Bacillus pumilus; and the fungus
Trichoderma harzianum. These are mainly effective for diseases affecting roots.
Agricultural Research Service scientists have found that
caprylic acid, a naturally-occurring
fatty acid in
milk and
coconuts, as well as other natural plant extracts have
antimicrobial characteristics that can help.
[17] Compost tea contains a mix of beneficial microbes, which may attack or out-compete certain plant pathogens,
[18] but variability among formulations and preparation methods may contribute to inconsistent results or even dangerous growth of toxic microbes in compost teas.
[19]
Some naturally-derived pesticides are not allowed for use on organic farms. These include
nicotine sulfate,
arsenic, and
strychnine.
[20]
Synthetic pesticides allowed for use on organic farms include
insecticidal soaps and
horticultural oils for insect management; and
Bordeaux mixture,
copper hydroxide and
sodium bicarbonate for managing fungi.
[20]
Genetic modification
A key characteristic of organic farming is the rejection of genetically engineered plants and animals. On October 19, 1998, participants at IFOAM's 12th Scientific Conference issued the
Mar del Plata Declaration, where more than 600 delegates from over 60 countries voted unanimously to exclude the use of genetically modified organisms in food production and agriculture.
Although opposition to the use of any transgenic technologies in organic farming is strong, agricultural researchers Luis Herrera-Estrella and Ariel Alvarez-Morales continue to advocate integration of
transgenic technologies into organic farming as the optimal means to sustainable agriculture, particularly in the developing world. Similarly, some organic farmers question the rationale behind the ban on the use of genetically engineered seed because they see it a biological technology consistent with organic principles.
Although GMOs are excluded from organic farming, there is concern that the pollen from genetically modified crops is increasingly penetrating organic and heirloom seed stocks, making it difficult, if not impossible, to keep these genomes from entering the organic food supply.
International trade restrictions limit the availability GMOs to certain countries.
[citation needed]
The dangers that genetic modification could pose to the environment and/or individual health are hotly contested.
Standards
Standards regulate production methods and in some cases final output for organic agriculture. Standards may be voluntary or legislated. As early as the 1970s private associations certified organic producers. In the 1980s, governments began to produce organic production guidelines. In the 1990s, a trend toward legislated standards began, most notably with the 1991
EU-Eco-regulation developed for
European Union, which set standards for 12 countries, and a 1993 UK program. The EU's program was followed by a Japanese program in 2001, and in 2002 the U.S. created the
National Organic Program (NOP). As of 2007 over 60 countries regulate organic farming (
IFOAM 2007:11). In 2005 IFOAM created the
Principles of Organic Agriculture, an international guideline for certification criteria.Typically the agencies accredit certification groups rather than individual farms.
Organic production materials used in and foods are tested independently by the Organic Materials Review Institute.
Growth
As of 2001, the estimated market value of certified organic products was estimated to be
$20 billion. By 2002 this was
$23 billion and by 2007 more than
$46 billion.
[32]
In recent years both Europe (2007: 7.8 million hectares, European Union: 7.2 million hectares) and North America (2007: 2.2 million hectares) have experienced strong growth in organic farmland. In the
EU it grew by 21% in the period 2005 to 2008.
[33] However, this growth has occurred under different conditions. While the European Union has shifted agricultural subsidies to organic farmers due to perceived environmental benefits, the United States has not,
[34] continuing to subsidize some but not all traditional commercial crops, such as corn and sugar. As a result of this policy difference, as of 2008 4.1% percent of European Union farmland was organically managed compared to the 0.6 percent in the U.S.
[32]
IFOAM's most recent edition of
The World of Organic Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2009 lists the countries which had the most hectares in 2007. The country with the most organic land is Australia with more than 12 million hectares, followed by Argentina, Brazil and the US. In total 32.2 million hectares were under organic management in 2007. For 1999 11 million hectares of organically managed land are reported.
[32]
As organic farming becomes a major commercial force in agriculture, it is likely to gain increasing impact on national agricultural policies and confront some of the scaling challenges faced by conventional agriculture.
[35]
Refference from Wikipedia.
As you can see from the data bove, the section "Growth", by 2007 more than $46 billion. No wonder a lot of product claim that thier product are "Organic". As organic product price are selling higher than the "non-organic" and the profit margin are higher too.
To know more about Malaysia Organic standard, you cna go to:
So my friend, if a handmade soap claimed that they are "Organic", think twice.
No Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS)
No Petroleum Product
No Parabens And No To Breast Cancer
No Chemical Preservatives
No Animal Product
No Testing On Animal
